Internationaux de Strasbourg: Emma Navarro vs Ann Li

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Emma Navarro and Ann Li met in the Strasbourg semi-finals, with Navarro taking the first step towards the final after a straight-sets win. The match was priced as a near-certain Navarro advance on prediction markets, with the crowd-implied probability at 100% YES, while the cross-platform comparison points to a more conventional favourite-bias than a genuine live contest. WTA coverage noted that Navarro moved to 2-0 in the head-to-head after the Strasbourg result, which is the main historical anchor for reading this contract.

The useful comparison for traders is not just the ranking gap, but how the market has absorbed recent form. TennisTemple had Li at world No. 30 and Navarro at No. 39 ahead of the semi-final, yet the WTA’s match report highlighted Navarro’s prior win over Shuai Zhang to reach the last four and her ability to recover from a tight start. That combination helps explain why analysts leaned Navarro, but it also shows why a 100% market price can be brittle if the match is not yet complete or if retirement, scheduling, or weather disrupts play.

The main catalysts are straightforward: official completion of the semi-final, any retirement news, and whether the tie is finished within the settlement window ending 2026-05-29T12:30:00Z. Strasbourg is an outdoor clay event, so delays can matter, and the market rules make cancellation, an incomplete match without a winner, or a delay beyond seven days resolve to 50-50. The most relevant recent source is the WTA match report on Navarro’s win over Li, which confirms the head-to-head and the result state the contract is built around.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.