Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Any Other Score | 100% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 0 - 0 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 0 - 1 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 1 - 0 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 0 - 2 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 1 - 1 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 2 - 0 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 0 - 3 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 1 - 2 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 2 - 1 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 3 - 0 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 1 - 3 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 2 - 2 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 3 - 1 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 2 - 3 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 3 - 2 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
| Sport Lisboa e Benfica 3 - 3 FC St. Gallen | 0% |
Market context
Sport Lisboa e Benfica’s meeting with FC St. Gallen has already produced a live benchmark: St. Gallen beat Benfica 2-1 in the first leg on 23 July, which means the exact-score market now sits against a recent upset rather than a clean favourite narrative.[5][9] That matters because exact-score contracts are inherently thin markets: even when one side is clearly stronger, the probability is spread across many scorelines, and a 0% crowd-implied price usually signals either a very specific listed score set or a market that is effectively treating “Any Other Score” as the most plausible outcome. Benfica’s broader form still points to the stronger underlying side, with recent previews showing a better win record and higher scoring rate than St. Gallen across comparable runs.[1][6][8]
Cross-platform pricing suggests the football market itself is still leaning towards Benfica, even after the first-leg result. Yahoo’s live lines have shown Benfica as a heavy handicap favourite at roughly -2.5, with an over/under around 3.5 goals and a one-sided moneyline, which implies sportsbooks expect Benfica to control the match far more than the prediction market’s current 0% YES price indicates.[2] St. Gallen’s recent results have been mixed but competitive, while Benfica’s domestic form has included repeated multi-goal outputs, so traders are mostly watching whether the scoreline corridor is narrow enough to match one of the contract’s listed outcomes or broad enough to fall into “Any Other Score”.[1][6][8]
The key catalysts are team news, whether the fixture remains on the scheduled kick-off, and how the second-leg context shapes line-ups and late-game risk-taking. The market only settles on the score after 90 minutes plus stoppage time, so late rotation, an early red card, or a tactical chase can matter more than aggregate context or any extra-time scenario.[3] Fox Sports’ live match page and The Athletic’s match box score confirm the tie was still live in regulation terms and that the first leg ended 2-1 to St. Gallen, which gives traders a concrete recent reference point but not a settled pattern for the return score.[3][5]
Methodology
We track Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. FC St. Gallen - Exact Score across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. FC St. Gallen - Exact Score on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →