Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| IFK Goteborg (-1.5) | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| IFK Goteborg O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| IFK Goteborg O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| IFK Goteborg 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| IFK Goteborg 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Degerfors IF (-1.5) | 0% |
| IFK Goteborg (-2.5) | 0% |
| Degerfors IF (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| IFK Goteborg O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| IFK Goteborg 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| IFK Goteborg 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
IFK Göteborg meeting Degerfors IF is priced very differently across venues, which matters because this contract is for the broader “more markets” set rather than the outright result. Sportsbook consensus is still pointing towards Göteborg as the more likely winner: SportsGambler says the home side are around 58.8% on a 1.70 price, while Sports Mole’s model puts Göteborg at 49.41% with a draw at 23.79% and Degerfors at 26.8%.[2][12] By contrast, the prediction market is currently at **100% YES**, so it is trading far above both bookmaker and model-based estimates.[2][12] ESPN’s market snapshot also shows a relatively balanced goals profile, with BTTS Yes at -145 and Göteborg team totals suggesting a low-variance scoring outlook rather than a one-sided blowout.[3]
Comparable pre-match cases for these sides have usually clustered around Göteborg as a modest favourite rather than a near-certain outcome. Historical odds pages show Göteborg commonly sat in the 1.65-1.71 range, implying roughly a 58-61% win chance, while Degerfors was regularly available at around 4.5-5.0 in the same fixtures.[4][7][9] Oddscalendar’s split of 36% Göteborg, 34% draw and 30% Degerfors is materially less bullish than the current market price, reinforcing that a 100% YES implies either a very specific “more markets” definition or an assumption that multiple sub-markets are already effectively locked in.[6]
For traders, the main catalysts are team-news timing and the final market definition, because “more markets” contracts can depend on whether any attached props are still open and how the exchange resolves linked outcomes. The match was scheduled for 8:00 AM ET on 2 August, so pre-kickoff line movement, confirmed line-ups and any late injury or suspension updates are the practical swing factors.[2][3] ESPN’s odds board also shows short prices on Göteborg to score at least once and a relatively tight BTTS line, so changes in expected team selection or tempo could matter more here than the 1X2 itself.[3]
Methodology
We track IFK Goteborg vs. Degerfors IF - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets UK. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade IFK Goteborg vs. Degerfors IF - More Markets on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →