Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
14% | 86% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
14% | 86% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| United States 1 - 1 Belgium | 14% |
| Any Other Score | 12% |
| United States 1 - 2 Belgium | 9% |
| United States 2 - 1 Belgium | 9% |
| United States 2 - 2 Belgium | 8% |
| United States 0 - 1 Belgium | 7% |
| United States 1 - 0 Belgium | 7% |
| United States 0 - 0 Belgium | 6% |
| United States 2 - 0 Belgium | 6% |
| United States 0 - 2 Belgium | 5% |
| United States 1 - 3 Belgium | 4% |
| United States 3 - 1 Belgium | 4% |
| United States 0 - 3 Belgium | 3% |
| United States 3 - 0 Belgium | 3% |
| United States 2 - 3 Belgium | 3% |
| United States 3 - 2 Belgium | 3% |
| United States 3 - 3 Belgium | 2% |
Market context
The United States faces Belgium in a FIFA World Cup Round of 16 clash on 6 July 2026 at 8:00 PM ET in Seattle, with the market resolving strictly on the 90-minute result plus stoppage time. The prediction market for an exact score currently implies a 6% probability for the listed outcome, a figure that diverges meaningfully from the broader sportsbook consensus where the USMNT is a slight favourite to advance at -118 (54.13% implied probability) [2]. While major bookmakers like BetMGM and Caesars report lopsided public backing for the US, with upwards of 91% of handle on the Americans, the specific exact-score contract remains thin, suggesting a sharp disconnect between general match sentiment and the precise probability of this narrow scoreline [1].
Historically, such low-probability exact-score markets in World Cup knockout stages often mirror the volatility seen in the USMNT’s recent warmup defeat, where Belgium blew out the Americans 5-2, exposing severe defensive frailties that could skew the final tally [3]. Comparable cases from previous tournaments show that when a favourite like the US is heavily backed by the public but possesses known defensive weaknesses, the actual score frequently deviates from the most popular three-way lines, rendering specific exact-score bets as high-risk coin flips rather than value plays. The current 6% implied probability reflects this uncertainty, standing in contrast to the more confident 54% implied probability for the US simply to advance, highlighting the difficulty of pinning down a single scoreline in a match where defensive errors are likely [2].
Traders must monitor the final squad announcements and any late injury updates before the 8:00 PM ET kickoff, as the USMNT’s defensive line remains the primary catalyst for score volatility [1]. Recent reports indicate that the US opened as a -120 favourite to advance, yet the defensive exposure shown in the 5-2 warmup loss suggests the match could be high-scoring, potentially pushing the total over the 2.5-goal line set by FanDuel [2]. With betting lines subject to change before kickoff, any shift in the US defensive roster could drastically alter the probability of the exact score, making the final pre-match squad list the most critical dependency for this contract [5]. The market remains open until the match is completed if postponed, ensuring that the resolution hinges solely on the regulation result once the game proceeds [4].
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Best Prediction Markets UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade United States vs. Belgium - Exact Score on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →