Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
95% | 5% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
95% | 5% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Erling Haaland: 1+ shots | 95% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 1+ shots | 94% |
| Erling Haaland: 2+ shots | 81% |
| Matheus Cunha: 1+ shots | 79% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 1+ shots | 74% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 2+ shots | 74% |
| Erling Haaland: 3+ shots | 66% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 3+ shots | 64% |
| Matheus Cunha: 2+ shots | 63% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 3+ shots on target | 48% |
| Igor Thiago: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 2+ shots on target | 48% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 3+ shots on target | 48% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 4+ shots on target | 48% |
| Raphinha: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 3+ shots on target | 48% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 4+ shots on target | 48% |
| Alisson: 2+ saves | 48% |
| Alisson: 5+ saves | 48% |
| Ørjan Nyland: 2+ saves | 48% |
| Ørjan Nyland: 3+ saves | 48% |
| Ørjan Nyland: 5+ saves | 48% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 2+ goals + assists | 48% |
| Matheus Cunha: 2+ goals + assists | 48% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 2+ goals + assists | 48% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 4+ goals + assists | 48% |
| Alisson: 4+ saves | 47% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 4+ goals + assists | 47% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 3+ goals + assists | 47% |
| Antonio Nusa: 1+ shots | 45% |
| Erling Haaland: 1+ shots on target | 45% |
| Erling Haaland: 1+ goals | 44% |
| Antonio Nusa: 2+ shots | 44% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 1+ shots | 43% |
| Erling Haaland: 4+ shots | 42% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 1+ goals | 41% |
| Igor Thiago: 1+ shots | 40% |
| Matheus Cunha: 1+ shots on target | 38% |
| Raphinha: 1+ goals + assists | 38% |
| Igor Thiago: 2+ shots on target | 35% |
| Raphinha: 1+ shots | 33% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 1+ shots on target | 33% |
| Raphinha: 2+ shots on target | 33% |
| Matheus Cunha: 3+ goals + assists | 33% |
| Matheus Cunha: 3+ shots | 32% |
| Alisson: 3+ saves | 32% |
| Raphinha: 2+ goals + assists | 32% |
| Matheus Cunha: 1+ goals | 31% |
| Ørjan Nyland: 4+ saves | 31% |
| Raphinha: 3+ goals + assists | 30% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 1+ goals + assists | 30% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 4+ shots | 29% |
| Erling Haaland: 2+ shots on target | 28% |
| Erling Haaland: 4+ shots on target | 28% |
| Igor Thiago: 3+ shots on target | 28% |
| Matheus Cunha: 4+ shots on target | 28% |
| Raphinha: 3+ shots on target | 28% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 2+ shots on target | 28% |
| Antonio Nusa: 3+ goals + assists | 28% |
| Antonio Nusa: 4+ goals + assists | 28% |
| Matheus Cunha: 4+ goals + assists | 28% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 2+ shots | 27% |
| Erling Haaland: 5+ shots | 27% |
| Antonio Nusa: 3+ shots on target | 27% |
| Raphinha: 4+ shots on target | 27% |
| Erling Haaland: 1+ goals + assists | 27% |
| Erling Haaland: 3+ goals + assists | 27% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 2+ shots | 26% |
| Antonio Nusa: 1+ shots on target | 26% |
| Igor Thiago: 4+ shots on target | 26% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 1+ assists | 25% |
| Matheus Cunha: 1+ goals + assists | 25% |
| Igor Thiago: 2+ shots | 24% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 3+ goals + assists | 24% |
| Raphinha: 2+ shots | 23% |
| Erling Haaland: 3+ shots on target | 22% |
| Antonio Nusa: 2+ goals + assists | 22% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 3+ shots | 21% |
| Igor Thiago: 4+ shots | 21% |
| Matheus Cunha: 2+ shots on target | 21% |
| Raphinha: 4+ goals + assists | 21% |
| Erling Haaland: 2+ goals + assists | 20% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 1+ goals + assists | 19% |
| Erling Haaland: 4+ goals + assists | 18% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 1+ goals | 17% |
| Antonio Nusa: 1+ goals + assists | 17% |
| Antonio Nusa: 3+ shots | 14% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 3+ shots | 14% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 5+ shots | 14% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 2+ shots on target | 14% |
| Antonio Nusa: 1+ goals | 13% |
| Igor Thiago: 1+ goals | 13% |
| Matheus Cunha: 5+ shots | 13% |
| Erling Haaland: 2+ goals | 12% |
| Antonio Nusa: 1+ assists | 12% |
| Antonio Nusa: 2+ shots on target | 12% |
| Matheus Cunha: 3+ shots on target | 12% |
| Igor Thiago: 3+ shots | 11% |
| Erling Haaland: 1+ assists | 11% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 2+ goals | 10% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 1+ assists | 10% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 4+ shots | 9% |
| Matheus Cunha: 1+ assists | 9% |
| Raphinha: 1+ goals | 8% |
| Antonio Nusa: 4+ shots | 8% |
| Matheus Cunha: 4+ shots | 8% |
| Raphinha: 3+ shots | 8% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 5+ shots | 7% |
| Igor Thiago: 5+ shots | 7% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 5+ shots | 7% |
| Raphinha: 4+ shots | 7% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 1+ goals | 6% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 4+ shots | 6% |
| Raphinha: 1+ assists | 6% |
| Matheus Cunha: 2+ goals | 4% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 2+ goals | 3% |
| Erling Haaland: 3+ goals | 3% |
| Raphinha: 5+ shots | 3% |
| Antonio Nusa: 2+ assists | 3% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 2+ assists | 3% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 2+ goals | 2% |
| Vinícius Júnior: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Antonio Nusa: 5+ shots | 2% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Erling Haaland: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Matheus Cunha: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Raphinha: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Alexander Sørloth: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Antonio Nusa: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Igor Thiago: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Igor Thiago: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Matheus Cunha: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Raphinha: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Raphinha: 3+ goals | 1% |
Market context
The FIFA World Cup Round of 16 clash between Brazil and Norway kicks off at 4:00 PM ET on Sunday at New York/New Jersey Stadium, with Brazil favoured to win despite Norway’s emerging knockout pedigree. Historical data from all four previous meetings shows Norway has never lost to Brazil, yet current squad depth and Brazil’s superior efficiency in the final third suggest a different outcome this time [1][7]. While bookmakers price Brazil at -125 to -165 on the moneyline, implying a 56% win probability, the prediction market’s 17% YES implied probability for Norway to cover player props represents a stark divergence from analyst consensus, which leans heavily toward a Brazil 2–1 victory and over 2.5 goals [1][2][5].
Traders should monitor confirmed lineups for injury updates, particularly regarding Raphinha, who is ruled out, and Lucas Paquetá, who faces a tournament-ending injury, as these absences significantly alter Brazil’s attacking options [7]. The most reliable catalyst remains the over 2.5 goals market, consistently favoured by experts across FanDuel, DraftKings, and Action Network, with odds ranging from -130 to -142 [5][6][8]. With the settlement window closing at 20:00 UTC on 5 July 2026, the key dependency is whether Norway can exploit Brazil’s transition vulnerabilities to score, a scenario supported by their unbeaten record against Brazil but contradicted by Brazil’s current form and depth [1][7].
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Brazil vs. Norway - Player Props on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →