Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Arthur Fery’s Cincinnati Open meeting with James Duckworth sits in a narrow pre-match market on the tennis side, but the contract price is detached from the rest of the field: the crowd-implied 100% YES points to a position that is effectively assuming the match outcome has already been decided. That contrasts with the pre-match pricing elsewhere, where bookmaker and model estimates were much closer to a live contest, with several outlets leaning only mildly to Fery and others still giving Duckworth a meaningful chance. Earlier public odds put Fery around the low-to-mid 50s on win probability, not at anything like a certainty.
The historical frame matters because this pairing has already been viewed as match-up sensitive rather than one-way traffic. Previews ahead of the scheduled round-two match highlighted Fery as the slight favourite, yet the market consensus was split enough to leave room for variance, especially on outdoor hard courts where hold rates and tie-break sequences can swing outcomes quickly. Comparable ATP Masters 1000 matches are often priced conservatively until line-ups are confirmed, so a 100% reading in a prediction market is only credible if the event has progressed materially beyond the original schedule.
Traders should watch for official tournament updates, court assignments and any retirement or walkover notices, because the settlement depends on whether the match is actually played and whether a winner advances. The contract’s 7-day delay clause also makes rescheduling critical: a postponement beyond 22 August without a completed result would push settlement towards 50-50. That leaves the key catalyst as straightforward event administration rather than form alone.
Methodology
We track Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
UK Frequently Asked Questions
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- What are the best prediction markets for UK traders in 2026?
- For UKGC-regulated markets: Betfair Exchange (sports, politics) and Smarkets (sports, politics, lower commission than Betfair). For broader global event prediction: Polymarket (deepest liquidity, 0% fee, USDC settlement). For US-regulated option: Kalshi (USD, limited UK payment options). Most serious UK traders use a combination of Betfair for regulated sports and Polymarket for broader markets.
Trade Cincinnati Open: Arthur Fery vs James Duckworth on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →