Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game 1 Winner | 100% |
| Game 2 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| Game Handicap: JDG (-1.5) vs MIBR.LOS (+1.5) | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 90% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 10% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 10% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 10% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 1? | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 42.5 in Game 1? | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 2? | 1% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 45.5 in Game 2? | 1% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 1? | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 2? | 0% |
Market context
JD Gaming face MIBR.LOS in the League of Legends Lower Bracket final of the Esports World Cup Group D, a match originally set for 9:50AM ET on 16 July. The contest is a best-of-three series where JD Gaming win the market if they secure the match victory, while MIBR.LOS win if they prevail; a cancellation, tie, or delay beyond seven days triggers a 50-50 resolution.
A 100% crowd-implied probability for JD Gaming is an extreme outlier in esports prediction markets, where even dominant teams rarely exceed 90% due to the inherent volatility of live play and the possibility of early disqualifications or technical failures. Historical cases in major tournaments show that near-certainty contracts often resolve to 50-50 when matches are postponed or abandoned, as seen in previous Esports World Cup incidents where scheduling conflicts forced cancellations, making the current pricing vulnerable to any disruption in the BO3 schedule.
Traders should monitor the official Esports World Cup schedule for confirmation that the match has commenced and completed, as the settlement window closes at 19:00 UTC on 16 July. Any announcement of a delay beyond the seven-day threshold or a cancellation before the first game would immediately invalidate the 100% line, while in-game dependencies such as server stability or player eligibility checks could also trigger the 50-50 clause if the match begins but remains unfinished.
Sources: 1
Methodology
We track LoL: JD Gaming vs MIBR.LOS (BO3) - Esports World Cup Group D across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade LoL: JD Gaming vs MIBR.LOS (BO3) - Esports World Cup… on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →