Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map Handicap: INOX (-1.5) vs Eternal Fire (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 90% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 10% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Eternal Fire (-3.5) vs INOX Division (+3.5) | 10% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Eternal Fire (-6.5) vs INOX Division (+6.5) | 10% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 10% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: INOX Division (-6.5) vs Eternal Fire (+6.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: INOX Division (-3.5) vs Eternal Fire (+3.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Eternal Fire (-3.5) vs INOX Division (+3.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Eternal Fire (-6.5) vs INOX Division (+6.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.5 | 10% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
| Map 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| Map Handicap: EF (-1.5) vs INOX Division (+1.5) | 0% |
Market context
Eternal Fire’s Bo3 with INOX Division in the NODWIN Clutch Series playoffs is priced far below the market’s crowd-implied **0% YES**, even though the fixture is live on the schedule and set for a 17:00 UTC start, with Eternal Fire listed around **world rank 19** and INOX Division around **51**. Comparable community and bookmaker signals are notably more balanced than the contract: Strafe’s user vote split was **52% INOX Division** to **48% Eternal Fire**, while a listed bookmaker line on bo3.gg showed Eternal Fire as the favourite, reflecting a clash between public sentiment, bookmaker pricing and the prediction-market contract.[1][3][6][10]
That makes prior results in this bracket useful mainly as a guide to volatility rather than a clean read-through. INOX Division have already shown they can take series in this event ecosystem, including a 2–0 over ex-Zero Tenacity in the NODWIN Clutch Series 9 closed qualifier and a 1–2 win over Betclic in the previous season’s play-offs, but Eternal Fire arrive with the stronger ranking and the more established profile.[9][11][13][20] For traders, the key catalysts are straightforward: confirmation that the match starts on time, whether the published Bo3 format remains unchanged, and whether any last-minute bracket reshuffle or server delay pushes settlement risk towards the 50-50 clause if the match is not completed within seven days.[1][3][5]
Live status matters here because the market settles on the actual match outcome only if the series is completed, and a started but unfinished Bo3 can still change the contract’s end state depending on how the organisers record the result. Bo3 trackers were already describing the series as a best-of-three playoff tie, but they also noted limited tournament data and, in some feeds, no live statistics yet, which is the sort of operational gap that can create short-term divergence between sportsbook odds, analyst models and a prediction market that is still marked at zero-implied probability.[2][3][6]
Methodology
We track Counter-Strike: Eternal Fire vs INOX Division (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Playoffs across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets UK. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Counter-Strike: Eternal Fire vs INOX Division (BO3) … on Best Prediction Markets UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →