Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

3DMAX face Liquid in a best-of-three lower-bracket match at the CS Asia Championships group stage, with the market currently pricing a narrow Liquid edge. The crowd-implied 56% for the YES side sits a little below published bookmaker sentiment: recent match pages had Liquid around 1.64, or roughly 61%, versus 3DMAX near 2.12. That gap is not large, but it does show the market is slightly more cautious than the books about Liquid’s chance of advancing.

The historical read is mixed rather than one-sided. BO3.gg’s recent meeting data points to a 75% head-to-head win rate for 3DMAX against Liquid, which supports the argument that map vetoes and preparation can matter more here than broad team reputation. The comparison should be treated carefully, though, because the teams have also met in different tournament contexts, and a single BO3 can turn on veto order, pistol rounds and side selection. For a contract that resolves only on a completed winner, the main comparator is not overall ranking but whether 3DMAX can recreate that matchup edge on the day.

The key catalysts are simple: official start time, whether the fixture remains on schedule, and the published veto/maps once the teams load into lobby. Liquipedia and event coverage suggest the tournament is still in its group-stage and lower-bracket phase, so there is little room for postponement without affecting settlement timing. A recent BO3.gg preview also flagged Mirage as a likely first ban from 3DMAX, which could influence how Liquid’s map pool is priced if the veto follows the same pattern. Traded odds may move sharply once line-ups and vetoes are confirmed, especially if one side has shown a stronger record on the first map.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.